Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 1,070 Wh | Explorer 1000 v2 leads
AC70 768 Wh
Explorer 1000 v2 1,070 Wh
Explorer 1000 v2: +302 Wh (+39.3%).
AC70 vs Explorer 1000 v2
VS
1,000W
Running power
1,500W
768 Wh
Battery
1,070 Wh
22.5 lbs
Weight
23.8 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two compact LFP stations in the 768–1070 Wh range for camping, tailgating, or light home backup. The Explorer 1000 v2 pulls ahead on raw capability: 1500W running power and 1070 Wh of capacity versus 1000W and 768 Wh for the AC70, and it powered 33 of 53 tested devices compared to the AC70's 24.
Jackery's unit also offers 4000 charge cycles and a 20ms UPS transfer, a feature the AC70 lacks entirely. The tradeoff sits with solar recharge speed.
Bluetti's AC70 accepts up to 500W of solar input and can refill in roughly 2.7 hours, while the Explorer 1000 v2 tops out at 400W and needs about 7.6 hours for a full charge. At 22.5 lbs versus 23.8 lbs, the weight difference is negligible for either use case.
Overall Winner
Explorer 1000 v2
Powers 33 of 53 tested devices vs 24 for AC70
Home backup: Explorer 1000 v2 RV / mobile: Explorer 1000 v2 Solar: AC70
Explorer 1000 v2 wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Choose AC70 if...
- + Portability matters for your setup
- + You want faster solar recharging
Choose Explorer 1000 v2 if...
- + Built-in UPS with 20ms switchover
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 1,500 W | Explorer 1000 v2 leads
AC70 1,000 W
Explorer 1000 v2 1,500 W
Explorer 1000 v2: +500 W (+50.0%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,000 W | Explorer 1000 v2 leads
AC70 2,000 W
Explorer 1000 v2 3,000 W
Explorer 1000 v2: +1,000 W (+50.0%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 22.5 lbs | AC70 leads
AC70 22.5 lbs (10.2 kg)
Explorer 1000 v2 23.8 lbs (10.8 kg)
AC70: -1.3 lbs (5.6% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,000 cycles | Explorer 1000 v2 leads
AC70 3,000 cycles
Explorer 1000 v2 4,000 cycles
Explorer 1000 v2: +1,000 cycles (+33.3%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 9 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 24 · Differences: 17% (9/53) · Neither can run: 20
Only Explorer 1000 v2 can run 9
2-Slice Bread Toaster AC70: Running shortfall
Electric Skillet AC70: Running shortfall
Electric Water Kettle AC70: Running shortfall
Instant Pot (6 Qt) AC70: Running shortfall
Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) AC70: Running + surge shortfall
Space Heater (1,500W) AC70: Running shortfall
Window AC (8,000 BTU) AC70: Needs soft-start
EV Charger (Level 1, 120V) AC70: Running shortfall
Washing Machine AC70: Running shortfall
Neither can run · 20 devices
These devices exceed both stations on running power and surge.
Coffee Maker
Digital Air Fryer
Electric Stove (Single Burner)
Microwave Oven (1000W)
Toaster Oven
Central AC (3-Ton)
Portable AC (12,000 BTU)
Dehumidifier (70 Pint)
Electric Clothes Dryer
Dishwasher
Sump Pump (1/2 HP)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Professional Hair Dryer
Circular Saw (Corded)
Corded Drill / Hammer Drill
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | AC70 | Explorer 1000 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 768 Wh | 1,070 Wh ✓ |
| Running Power | 1,000 W | 1,500 W ✓ |
| Surge Power | 2,000 W | 3,000 W ✓ |
| Weight | 22.5 lbs (10.2 kg) ✓ | 23.8 lbs (10.8 kg) |
| Energy Density | 75.3 Wh/kg | 99.1 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | portable | portable |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 | 4,000 ✓ |
| Expandable | No | No |
| UPS | No | Yes (20 ms) |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
AC70
Faster Max solar input 500 W
Connector XT60
Full charge time ~2.7h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 12-58V
Explorer 1000 v2
Max solar input 400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~7.6h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 16-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
AC70Explorer 1000 v2
Emergency(2)
1/21/2
1/2
1/2
| Device | AC70 | Runtime | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Size Freezer (15-17 Cu. Ft.) | Safe | 3.4h | Safe | 4.7h |
| Sump Pump (1/2 HP) | Fail | N/A | Soft Start | 0.7h |
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
1/22/2
1/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
1/74/7
1/7
4/7
| Device | AC70 | Runtime | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 6.5h | Safe | 9h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Fail | N/A | Soft Start | 0.9h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.7h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Fail | N/A | Tight | 0.5h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Soft Start | 0.8h | Safe | 1.1h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
1/31/3
1/3
1/3
| Device | AC70 | Runtime | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 3h | Safe | 4.2h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
2/116/11
2/11
6/11
| Device | AC70 | Runtime | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Fail | N/A | Tight | 0.5h |
| Coffee Maker | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Digital Air Fryer | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Skillet | Fail | N/A | Tight | 0.5h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Water Kettle | Fail | N/A | Tight | 0.5h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Fail | N/A | Tight | 0.5h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Rice Cooker | Tight | 0.6h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 2.5h |
| Toaster Oven | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
Large Appliances(4)
1/42/4
1/4
2/4
| Device | AC70 | Runtime | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 2.6h | Safe | 3.6h |
| Washing Machine | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.6h |
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
5/65/6
5/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
1/21/2
1/2
1/2
Power Tools(5)
0/50/5
0/5
0/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
The AC70 makes sense for solar-dependent users who need the fastest possible recharge and can work within a 1000W power ceiling. The Explorer 1000 v2 is the stronger pick for anyone who needs broader device coverage, higher output, and UPS functionality for short outages. Overall, the Explorer 1000 v2 earns the recommendation with a score of 61 versus 46.5, delivering more usable power and longer cycle life in a nearly identical form factor.
AC70 vs Explorer 1000 v2 FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, AC70 or Explorer 1000 v2?
Explorer 1000 v2 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, AC70 or Explorer 1000 v2?
Explorer 1000 v2 has higher battery capacity (1,070 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
AC70 has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, AC70 or Explorer 1000 v2?
AC70 is lighter at 22.5 lbs vs 23.8 lbs. AC70 is rated portable for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
Explorer 1000 v2 powers 33 of 53 tested devices, compared to 24 for AC70.
Q Does AC70 or Explorer 1000 v2 have UPS mode for power outages?
Only Explorer 1000 v2 has UPS (uninterruptible power supply) mode with a 20ms switchover time, which keeps connected devices running during a power outage without interruption.