Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 1,070 Wh | Explorer 1000 v2 leads
Explorer 1000 v2 1,070 Wh
VTOMAN Jump 1500X 828 Wh
Explorer 1000 v2: +242 Wh (+29.2%).
Explorer 1000 v2 vs VTOMAN Jump 1500X
VS
1,500W
Running power
1,500W
1,070 Wh
Battery
828 Wh
23.8 lbs
Weight
36.2 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two 1500W LFP portable power stations with identical surge ratings of 3000W. The Explorer 1000 v2 pulls ahead on several practical fronts: it packs 1070 Wh of capacity versus the Jump 1500X's 828 Wh, weighs 12.4 lbs less at 23.8 lbs, and delivers 4000 battery cycles compared to 3000.
Solar charging is also faster on the Jackery unit, with 400W max input cutting full recharge to roughly 7.6 hours versus 8.3 hours at 200W for the VTOMAN. Compatibility testing across 53 devices came out even at 33 apiece, so neither unit has a meaningful edge in device coverage.
The one area where the Jump 1500X stands out is expandability, letting you add extra battery capacity down the road, something the Explorer 1000 v2 does not support. That tradeoff matters if your power needs are likely to grow.
Overall Winner
Explorer 1000 v2
Powers 33 of 53 tested devices
Home backup: Explorer 1000 v2 RV / mobile: Explorer 1000 v2 Solar: Explorer 1000 v2
Choose Explorer 1000 v2 if...
- + Portability matters (24 lbs vs 36)
- + You want faster solar recharging
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Choose VTOMAN Jump 1500X if...
- + You want future battery expansion
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 1,500 W | Tie
Explorer 1000 v2 1,500 W
VTOMAN Jump 1500X 1,500 W
Delta: Tie (0%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,000 W | Tie
Explorer 1000 v2 3,000 W
VTOMAN Jump 1500X 3,000 W
Delta: Tie (0%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 23.8 lbs | Explorer 1000 v2 leads
Explorer 1000 v2 23.8 lbs (10.8 kg)
VTOMAN Jump 1500X 36.2 lbs (16.4 kg)
Explorer 1000 v2: -12.3 lbs (34.1% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,000 cycles | Explorer 1000 v2 leads
Explorer 1000 v2 4,000 cycles
VTOMAN Jump 1500X 3,000 cycles
Explorer 1000 v2: +1,000 cycles (+33.3%).
Compatibility Coverage
These two stations produce the same result on 53 of 53 devices.
Both can run: 33 · Neither can run: 20
Neither can run · 20 devices
These devices draw more continuous watts than either station can deliver.
Sump Pump (1/2 HP)
Central AC (3-Ton)
Portable AC (12,000 BTU)
Dehumidifier (70 Pint)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Coffee Maker
Digital Air Fryer
Electric Stove (Single Burner)
Microwave Oven (1000W)
Toaster Oven
Electric Clothes Dryer
Dishwasher
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Professional Hair Dryer
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Corded Drill / Hammer Drill
Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | Explorer 1000 v2 | VTOMAN Jump 1500X |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1,070 Wh ✓ | 828 Wh |
| Running Power | 1,500 W | 1,500 W |
| Surge Power | 3,000 W | 3,000 W |
| Weight | 23.8 lbs (10.8 kg) ✓ | 36.2 lbs (16.4 kg) |
| Energy Density | 99.1 Wh/kg ✓ | 50.5 Wh/kg |
| Portability Tier | portable | portable |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 4,000 ✓ | 3,000 |
| Expandable | No | Yes |
| UPS | Yes (20 ms) | Yes |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
Explorer 1000 v2
Faster Max solar input 400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~7.6h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 16-60V
VTOMAN Jump 1500X
Max solar input 200 W
Connector DC5521
Full charge time ~8.3h
Compatible panels 12/20
MPPT: 12-30V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
Explorer 1000 v2VTOMAN Jump 1500X
Emergency(2)
1/21/2
1/2
1/2
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | VTOMAN Jump 1500X | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Size Freezer (15-17 Cu. Ft.) | Safe | 4.7h | Safe | 3.6h |
| Sump Pump (1/2 HP) | Soft Start | 0.7h | Soft Start | 0.5h |
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
4/74/7
4/7
4/7
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | VTOMAN Jump 1500X | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 9h | Safe | 7h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Soft Start | 0.9h | Soft Start | 0.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 0.7h | Safe | 0.5h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Tight | 0.5h | Tight | 0.4h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 0.8h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
1/31/3
1/3
1/3
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | VTOMAN Jump 1500X | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 4.2h | Safe | 3.2h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
6/116/11
6/11
6/11
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | VTOMAN Jump 1500X | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Tight | 0.5h | Tight | 0.4h |
| Coffee Maker | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Digital Air Fryer | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Skillet | Tight | 0.5h | Tight | 0.4h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Water Kettle | Tight | 0.5h | Tight | 0.4h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Tight | 0.5h | Tight | 0.4h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.6h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 2.5h | Safe | 1.9h |
| Toaster Oven | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
Large Appliances(4)
2/42/4
2/4
2/4
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | VTOMAN Jump 1500X | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Fail | N/A | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 3.6h | Safe | 2.8h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 0.6h | Safe | 0.4h |
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
5/65/6
5/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
1/21/2
1/2
1/2
Power Tools(5)
0/50/5
0/5
0/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
Pick the Explorer 1000 v2 if you want more built-in capacity, longer cycle life, and a significantly lighter unit for camping, tailgating, or moderate home backup. The Jump 1500X makes sense for buyers who plan to expand storage later and can tolerate the extra weight.
Overall, the Explorer 1000 v2 earns the edge as the stronger all-around pick for most portable power needs. In our 53-device benchmark, Explorer 1000 v2 powers 33 devices and VTOMAN Jump 1500X powers 33.
Explorer 1000 v2 vs VTOMAN Jump 1500X FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, Explorer 1000 v2 or VTOMAN Jump 1500X?
Explorer 1000 v2 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, Explorer 1000 v2 or VTOMAN Jump 1500X?
Explorer 1000 v2 has higher battery capacity (1,070 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
Explorer 1000 v2 has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, Explorer 1000 v2 or VTOMAN Jump 1500X?
Explorer 1000 v2 is lighter at 23.8 lbs vs 36.2 lbs. Explorer 1000 v2 is rated portable for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
Both power stations can run 33 of 53 tested devices.
Q Can you expand the battery capacity of Explorer 1000 v2 or VTOMAN Jump 1500X?
Only VTOMAN Jump 1500X supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 1000 v2 is limited to its built-in 1,070 Wh.