Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,042 Wh | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
SOLIX C1000 1,056 Wh
Explorer 2000 v2 2,042 Wh
Explorer 2000 v2: +986 Wh (+93.4%).
SOLIX C1000 vs Explorer 2000 v2
VS
1,800W
Running power
2,200W
1,056 Wh
Battery
2,042 Wh
28.4 lbs
Weight
39.5 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between a midsize and a large LFP power station for home backup, camping, or solar-dependent setups. The Explorer 2000 v2 from Jackery nearly doubles the SOLIX C1000's battery capacity (2,042 Wh vs. 1,056 Wh) and delivers significantly more running power at 2,200W with a 4,400W surge, compared to 1,800W and 2,400W for the Anker unit.
That extra headroom shows in device coverage: the Explorer 2000 v2 powered 45 of 53 tested devices versus 38 for the C1000. Jackery's unit also offers 4,000 charge cycles to the C1000's 3,000.
The tradeoff is weight and portability. At 28.4 lbs, the C1000 is roughly 11 lbs lighter, and its 600W solar input with a 3.8-hour solar charge time far outpaces the Explorer 2000 v2's 400W input and 14.6-hour solar recharge.
Overall Winner
Explorer 2000 v2
Powers 45 of 53 tested devices vs 38 for SOLIX C1000
Home backup: Explorer 2000 v2 RV / mobile: Tie Solar: SOLIX C1000
Explorer 2000 v2 wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Choose SOLIX C1000 if...
- + Portability matters (28 lbs vs 40)
- + You want faster solar recharging
- + You want future battery expansion
Choose Explorer 2000 v2 if...
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,200 W | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
SOLIX C1000 1,800 W
Explorer 2000 v2 2,200 W
Explorer 2000 v2: +400 W (+22.2%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,400 W | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
SOLIX C1000 2,400 W
Explorer 2000 v2 4,400 W
Explorer 2000 v2: +2,000 W (+83.3%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 28.4 lbs | SOLIX C1000 leads
SOLIX C1000 28.4 lbs (12.9 kg)
Explorer 2000 v2 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg)
SOLIX C1000: -11.0 lbs (27.9% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,000 cycles | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
SOLIX C1000 3,000 cycles
Explorer 2000 v2 4,000 cycles
Explorer 2000 v2: +1,000 cycles (+33.3%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 7 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 38 · Differences: 13% (7/53) · Neither can run: 8
Only Explorer 2000 v2 can run 7
Dehumidifier (70 Pint) SOLIX C1000: Needs soft-start
Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) SOLIX C1000: Needs soft-start
Portable AC (12,000 BTU) SOLIX C1000: Needs soft-start
Corded Drill / Hammer Drill SOLIX C1000: Surge shortfall
Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak) SOLIX C1000: Surge shortfall
Sump Pump (1/2 HP) SOLIX C1000: Needs soft-start
Microwave Oven (1000W) SOLIX C1000: Running shortfall
Neither can run · 8 devices
These are 240V or high-voltage devices — neither station supports them.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | SOLIX C1000 | Explorer 2000 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1,056 Wh | 2,042 Wh ✓ |
| Running Power | 1,800 W | 2,200 W ✓ |
| Surge Power | 2,400 W | 4,400 W ✓ |
| Weight | 28.4 lbs (12.9 kg) ✓ | 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg) |
| Energy Density | 81.9 Wh/kg | 114.1 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | portable | portable |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 | 4,000 ✓ |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | Yes (20 ms) | Yes (20 ms) |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
SOLIX C1000
Faster Max solar input 600 W
Connector XT60
Full charge time ~3.8h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 11-60V
Explorer 2000 v2
Max solar input 400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~14.6h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 16-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
SOLIX C1000Explorer 2000 v2
Emergency(2)
1/22/2
1/2
2/2
| Device | SOLIX C1000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Size Freezer (15-17 Cu. Ft.) | Safe | 4.6h | Safe | 8.9h |
| Sump Pump (1/2 HP) | Soft Start | 0.7h | Safe | 1.3h |
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
3/76/7
3/7
6/7
| Device | SOLIX C1000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 8.9h | Safe | 17.2h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Soft Start | 0.9h | Safe | 1.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Soft Start | 0.7h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Soft Start | 0.5h | Tight | 1.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Tight | 1h | Safe | 2h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
1/31/3
1/3
1/3
| Device | SOLIX C1000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 4.1h | Safe | 7.9h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
10/1111/11
10/11
11/11
| Device | SOLIX C1000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Tight | 0.4h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Tight | 0.4h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.7h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 2.5h | Safe | 4.8h |
| Toaster Oven | Tight | 0.4h | Safe | 0.8h |
Large Appliances(4)
3/43/4
3/4
3/4
| Device | SOLIX C1000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Tight | 0.4h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 3.6h | Safe | 6.9h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 0.6h | Safe | 1.1h |
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
5/65/6
5/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Power Tools(5)
0/52/5
0/5
2/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
Pick the SOLIX C1000 if portability and fast solar charging matter most; its lighter frame and 3.8-hour solar refill suit mobile off-grid use where you can accept a smaller capacity. Go with the Explorer 2000 v2 if you need broad device compatibility, higher sustained output, and a larger energy reserve for home backup or extended outages. With an overall score of 88 to the C1000's 72, the Explorer 2000 v2 is the stronger choice for most buyers.
SOLIX C1000 vs Explorer 2000 v2 FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, SOLIX C1000 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Explorer 2000 v2 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, SOLIX C1000 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Explorer 2000 v2 has higher battery capacity (2,042 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
SOLIX C1000 has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, SOLIX C1000 or Explorer 2000 v2?
SOLIX C1000 is lighter at 28.4 lbs vs 39.5 lbs. SOLIX C1000 is rated portable for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
Explorer 2000 v2 powers 45 of 53 tested devices, compared to 38 for SOLIX C1000.
Q Can you expand the battery capacity of SOLIX C1000 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Only SOLIX C1000 supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 2000 v2 is limited to its built-in 2,042 Wh.