Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,840 Wh | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 3,840 Wh
Explorer 2000 v2 2,042 Wh
Anker SOLIX F3800: +1,798 Wh (+88.1%).
Anker SOLIX F3800 vs Explorer 2000 v2
VS
6,000W
Running power
2,200W
3,840 Wh
Battery
2,042 Wh
132.3 lbs
Weight
39.5 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers weighing a high-capacity home backup unit against a lighter, more portable alternative. The Anker SOLIX F3800 delivers 6,000W of running power and 3,840 Wh of stored energy, nearly triple the Explorer 2000 v2's 2,200W output and roughly 88% more capacity.
That muscle translates directly to device coverage: the F3800 powered 52 of 53 tested appliances, while the Explorer 2000 v2 handled 45 of 53. Expansion support on the F3800 also means you can scale storage over time, something the Jackery unit cannot do.
The tradeoff is significant, though. At 132.3 lbs the F3800 is essentially stationary, whereas the Explorer 2000 v2 weighs just 39.5 lbs and includes a 20 ms UPS function, making it far more practical for travel or quick-switchover desktop protection.
Overall Winner
Anker SOLIX F3800
Powers 52 of 53 tested devices vs 45 for Explorer 2000 v2
Home backup: Anker SOLIX F3800 RV / mobile: Explorer 2000 v2 Solar: Anker SOLIX F3800
Anker SOLIX F3800 wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Choose Anker SOLIX F3800 if...
- + You want faster solar recharging
- + You need 240V-capable loads
- + You want future battery expansion
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Choose Explorer 2000 v2 if...
- + Portability matters (40 lbs vs 132)
- + Built-in UPS with 20ms switchover
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 6,000 W | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 6,000 W
Explorer 2000 v2 2,200 W
Anker SOLIX F3800: +3,800 W (+172.7%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 9,000 W | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 9,000 W
Explorer 2000 v2 4,400 W
Anker SOLIX F3800: +4,600 W (+104.5%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 39.5 lbs | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 132.3 lbs (60.0 kg)
Explorer 2000 v2 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg)
Explorer 2000 v2: -92.8 lbs (70.2% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,000 cycles | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 3,000 cycles
Explorer 2000 v2 4,000 cycles
Explorer 2000 v2: +1,000 cycles (+33.3%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 7 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 45 · Differences: 13% (7/53) · Neither can run: 1
Only Anker SOLIX F3800 can run 7
Circular Saw (Corded) Explorer 2000 v2: Surge shortfall
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch) Explorer 2000 v2: Surge shortfall
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon) Explorer 2000 v2: Surge shortfall
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) Explorer 2000 v2: Voltage mismatch
Well Pump (1 HP) Explorer 2000 v2: Voltage mismatch
Electric Clothes Dryer Explorer 2000 v2: Voltage mismatch
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU) Explorer 2000 v2: Surge shortfall
Neither can run · 1 devices
These devices have startup surges that exceed both stations.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Explorer 2000 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 3,840 Wh ✓ | 2,042 Wh |
| Running Power | 6,000 W ✓ | 2,200 W |
| Surge Power | 9,000 W ✓ | 4,400 W |
| Weight | 132.3 lbs (60.0 kg) | 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 64.0 Wh/kg | 114.1 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | stationary | portable |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 | 4,000 ✓ |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | Yes (20 ms) |
| AC Voltage | 120V/240V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
Anker SOLIX F3800
Faster Max solar input 2,400 W
Connector XT60
Full charge time ~13.7h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 11-60V
Explorer 2000 v2
Max solar input 400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~14.6h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 16-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
Anker SOLIX F3800Explorer 2000 v2
Emergency(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
6/76/7
6/7
6/7
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 32.4h | Safe | 17.2h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Safe | 3.1h | Safe | 1.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 2.5h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Tight | 1.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 3.8h | Safe | 2h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
3/31/3
3/3
1/3
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Tight | 0.5h | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 14.9h | Safe | 7.9h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Safe | 1.1h | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
11/1111/11
11/11
11/11
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 1.7h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 1.6h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 0.7h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 2.9h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 9h | Safe | 4.8h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 0.8h |
Large Appliances(4)
4/43/4
4/4
3/4
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
6/65/6
6/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Power Tools(5)
5/52/5
5/5
2/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
Choose the Anker SOLIX F3800 if you need whole-home backup power, plan to run large appliances, or want expandable storage for future needs. Pick the Explorer 2000 v2 if portability and built-in UPS matter more than raw output, and your loads stay under 2,200W. Overall, the F3800 earns the win with a score of 100 versus 88, covering nearly every device tested and offering substantially more power for stationary use.
Anker SOLIX F3800 vs Explorer 2000 v2 FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Anker SOLIX F3800 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Anker SOLIX F3800 has higher battery capacity (3,840 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
Anker SOLIX F3800 has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Explorer 2000 v2 is lighter at 39.5 lbs vs 132.3 lbs. Explorer 2000 v2 is rated portable for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
Anker SOLIX F3800 powers 52 of 53 tested devices, compared to 45 for Explorer 2000 v2.
Q Can you expand the battery capacity of Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Only Anker SOLIX F3800 supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 2000 v2 is limited to its built-in 2,042 Wh.
Q Does Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 2000 v2 have UPS mode for power outages?
Only Explorer 2000 v2 has UPS (uninterruptible power supply) mode with a 20ms switchover time, which keeps connected devices running during a power outage without interruption.