Capacity
Delta: Tie (0%).
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two similarly sized Bluetti LFP stations that share the same 2048 Wh capacity and identical solar charge times of 7.3 hours. The AC200L pushes 2400W of continuous power and accepts up to 1200W of solar input, giving it a faster path to topping off through panels alone.
The AC200MAX counters with a 4800W surge rating, nearly double the AC200L's 3600W, which matters for starting compressors, pumps, and other motor-driven loads. In device compatibility testing across 53 appliances, the AC200MAX powered 45 versus 43 for the AC200L, earning it a higher overall score of 88.5 to 83.5.
The tradeoff is straightforward: higher running wattage and solar headroom on one side, stronger surge capacity and broader device coverage on the other.
Overall Winner
AC200MAX
Powers 45 of 53 tested devices vs 43 for AC200L
AC200MAX wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Delta: Tie (0%).
AC200L: +200 W (+9.1%).
AC200MAX: +1,200 W (+33.3%).
AC200MAX: -0.4 lbs (0.7% lighter).
AC200MAX: +500 cycles (+16.7%).
Out of 53 devices tested, 2 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 43 · Differences: 4% (2/53) · Neither can run: 8
These are 240V or high-voltage devices โ neither station supports them.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
| Spec | AC200L | AC200MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,048 Wh | 2,048 Wh |
| Running Power | 2,400 W ✓ | 2,200 W |
| Surge Power | 3,600 W | 4,800 W ✓ |
| Weight | 62.4 lbs (28.3 kg) | 61.9 lbs (28.1 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 72.4 Wh/kg | 72.9 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | heavy | heavy |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 | 3,500 ✓ |
| Expandable | Yes | Yes |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
MPPT: 12-145V
MPPT: 10-145V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | AC200MAX | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 17.3h | Safe | 17.3h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Tight | 1.7h | Safe | 1.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Soft Start | 1.1h | Tight | 1.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Safe | 2h |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | AC200MAX | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 8h | Safe | 8h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | AC200MAX | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Safe | 0.7h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 4.8h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | AC200MAX | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 6.9h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 1.1h |
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
Pick the AC200L if your priority is maximizing solar charging speed with up to 1200W input and you need that extra 200W of continuous output for sustained loads. Go with the AC200MAX if surge-heavy appliances are part of your setup and you want the widest device compatibility, backed by 3500 rated cycles versus 3000. The AC200MAX is the stronger overall pick for home backup and mixed-use scenarios where reliable startup power and long cycle life carry more weight than raw solar input.
AC200MAX is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Both have similar battery capacity, so runtime depends on the specific device load and efficiency factors.
AC200MAX has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
AC200MAX is lighter at 61.9 lbs vs 62.4 lbs. AC200MAX is rated heavy for portability.
AC200MAX powers 45 of 53 tested devices, compared to 43 for AC200L.