Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,840 Wh | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 3,840 Wh
Explorer 3000 Pro 3,024 Wh
Anker SOLIX F3800: +816 Wh (+27.0%).
Anker SOLIX F3800 vs Explorer 3000 Pro
VS
6,000W
Running power
3,000W
3,840 Wh
Battery
3,024 Wh
132.3 lbs
Weight
63.9 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two high-capacity portable power stations for home backup, off-grid use, or heavy-load applications. The Anker SOLIX F3800 dominates on raw capability: 6,000W running power and 9,000W surge let it handle 52 of 53 tested devices, compared to 47 of 53 for the Explorer 3000 Pro.
Its 3,840 Wh LFP battery supports 3,000 charge cycles, offering roughly 50% more longevity than the Jackery's 2,000-cycle NMC cells. The F3800 is also expandable, so you can scale storage over time.
Solar input peaks at 2,400W versus 1,400W on the Jackery, giving the Anker a clear edge for larger panel arrays. The tradeoff is weight: the F3800 tips the scales at 132.3 lbs, more than double the Explorer 3000 Pro's 63.9 lbs, which matters if you need to load and transport your unit regularly.
Overall Winner
Anker SOLIX F3800
Powers 52 of 53 tested devices vs 47 for Explorer 3000 Pro
Home backup: Anker SOLIX F3800 RV / mobile: Explorer 3000 Pro Solar: Tie
Anker SOLIX F3800 wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Choose Anker SOLIX F3800 if...
- + You value battery longevity (LFP, 3,000 cycles)
- + You need 240V-capable loads
- + You want future battery expansion
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Choose Explorer 3000 Pro if...
- + Portability matters (64 lbs vs 132)
- + You want faster solar recharging
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 6,000 W | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 6,000 W
Explorer 3000 Pro 3,000 W
Anker SOLIX F3800: +3,000 W (+100.0%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 9,000 W | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 9,000 W
Explorer 3000 Pro 6,000 W
Anker SOLIX F3800: +3,000 W (+50.0%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 63.9 lbs | Explorer 3000 Pro leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 132.3 lbs (60.0 kg)
Explorer 3000 Pro 63.9 lbs (29.0 kg)
Explorer 3000 Pro: -68.3 lbs (51.7% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,000 cycles | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 3,000 cycles
Explorer 3000 Pro 2,000 cycles
Anker SOLIX F3800: +1,000 cycles (+50.0%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 5 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 47 · Differences: 9% (5/53) · Neither can run: 1
Only Anker SOLIX F3800 can run 5
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) Explorer 3000 Pro: Voltage mismatch
Well Pump (1 HP) Explorer 3000 Pro: Voltage mismatch
Electric Clothes Dryer Explorer 3000 Pro: Voltage mismatch
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU) Explorer 3000 Pro: Needs soft-start
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon) Explorer 3000 Pro: Needs soft-start
Neither can run · 1 devices
These devices have startup surges that exceed both stations.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Explorer 3000 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 3,840 Wh ✓ | 3,024 Wh |
| Running Power | 6,000 W ✓ | 3,000 W |
| Surge Power | 9,000 W ✓ | 6,000 W |
| Weight | 132.3 lbs (60.0 kg) | 63.9 lbs (29.0 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 64.0 Wh/kg | 104.3 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | stationary | heavy |
| Chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 ✓ | 2,000 |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V/240V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
Anker SOLIX F3800
Max solar input 2,400 W
Connector XT60
Full charge time ~13.7h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 11-60V
Explorer 3000 Pro
Faster Max solar input 1,400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~10.8h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 17.5-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
Anker SOLIX F3800Explorer 3000 Pro
Emergency(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
6/76/7
6/7
6/7
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 32.4h | Safe | 25.5h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Safe | 3.1h | Safe | 2.5h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 2.5h | Safe | 2h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 3.8h | Safe | 3h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
3/31/3
3/3
1/3
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Tight | 0.5h | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 14.9h | Safe | 11.8h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Safe | 1.1h | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
11/1111/11
11/11
11/11
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 1.7h | Safe | 1.3h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 1.6h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 1.1h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 2.9h | Safe | 2.2h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 9h | Safe | 7.1h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 1.2h |
Large Appliances(4)
4/43/4
4/4
3/4
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
6/65/6
6/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Power Tools(5)
5/54/5
5/5
4/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
Pick the Anker SOLIX F3800 if you need maximum device coverage, expandable storage, and the durability of LFP chemistry for whole-home backup or sustained off-grid power. The Explorer 3000 Pro makes sense for buyers who prioritize portability at roughly half the weight and still want solid 3,000W output for lighter loads. Overall, the F3800 earns the win with a score of 100 versus the Jackery's 93, delivering superior power, capacity, and long-term cycle life.
Anker SOLIX F3800 vs Explorer 3000 Pro FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 3000 Pro?
Anker SOLIX F3800 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 3000 Pro?
Anker SOLIX F3800 has higher battery capacity (3,840 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
Explorer 3000 Pro has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 3000 Pro?
Explorer 3000 Pro is lighter at 63.9 lbs vs 132.3 lbs. Explorer 3000 Pro is rated heavy for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
Anker SOLIX F3800 powers 52 of 53 tested devices, compared to 47 for Explorer 3000 Pro.
Q Can you expand the battery capacity of Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 3000 Pro?
Only Anker SOLIX F3800 supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 3000 Pro is limited to its built-in 3,024 Wh.