Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,048 Wh | AC200MAX leads
AC200MAX 2,048 Wh
EB3A 268.8 Wh
AC200MAX: +1,779 Wh (+661.9%).
AC200MAX vs EB3A
2,200W
Running power
600W
2,048 Wh
Battery
268.8 Wh
61.9 lbs
Weight
10.1 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two Bluetti LFP stations that sit at opposite ends of the capacity spectrum. The AC200MAX delivers 2,200W of running power and 2,048 Wh of stored energy, while the EB3A provides 600W and just 268.8 Wh. That gap shows up clearly in device coverage: the AC200MAX powered 45 out of 53 tested devices compared to 21 for the EB3A, earning a score of 88.5 versus 41.
Expansion capability further separates them; the AC200MAX accepts additional battery modules, but the EB3A does not. Solar throughput follows the same pattern, with the AC200MAX handling up to 900W of panel input across 20 compatible panels versus 200W and 6 panels for the smaller unit. The tradeoff is portability.
At 10.1 lbs, the EB3A is roughly six times lighter than the 61.9 lb AC200MAX, making it far easier to grab and go.
Overall Winner
AC200MAX
Powers 45 of 53 tested devices vs 21 for EB3A
Home backup: AC200MAX RV / mobile: Tie Solar: AC200MAX
Choose AC200MAX if...
- + You want future battery expansion
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Choose EB3A if...
- + Portability matters (10 lbs vs 62)
- + You want faster solar recharging
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,200 W | AC200MAX leads
AC200MAX 2,200 W
EB3A 600 W
AC200MAX: +1,600 W (+266.7%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,800 W | AC200MAX leads
AC200MAX 4,800 W
EB3A 1,200 W
AC200MAX: +3,600 W (+300.0%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 10.1 lbs | EB3A leads
AC200MAX 61.9 lbs (28.1 kg)
EB3A 10.1 lbs (4.6 kg)
EB3A: -51.8 lbs (83.6% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,500 cycles | AC200MAX leads
AC200MAX 3,500 cycles
EB3A 2,500 cycles
AC200MAX: +1,000 cycles (+40.0%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 24 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 21 · Differences: 45% (24/53) · Neither can run: 8
Only AC200MAX can run 24
2-Slice Bread Toaster EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Coffee Maker EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Digital Air Fryer EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Skillet EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Stove (Single Burner) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Water Kettle EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Instant Pot (6 Qt) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Microwave Oven (1000W) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Toaster Oven EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Rice Cooker EB3A: Running shortfall
Dehumidifier (70 Pint) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Portable AC (12,000 BTU) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Space Heater (1,500W) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Window AC (8,000 BTU) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Dishwasher EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Washing Machine EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Corded Drill / Hammer Drill EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Sump Pump (1/2 HP) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Desktop PC (Gaming/Workstation) EB3A: Running shortfall
EV Charger (Level 1, 120V) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Professional Hair Dryer EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Laser Printer EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Neither can run · 8 devices
These are 240V or high-voltage devices — neither station supports them.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Electric Clothes Dryer
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | AC200MAX | EB3A |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,048 Wh ✓ | 268.8 Wh |
| Running Power | 2,200 W ✓ | 600 W |
| Surge Power | 4,800 W ✓ | 1,200 W |
| Weight | 61.9 lbs (28.1 kg) | 10.1 lbs (4.6 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 72.9 Wh/kg ✓ | 58.4 Wh/kg |
| Portability Tier | heavy | ultralight |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,500 ✓ | 2,500 |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
AC200MAX
Max solar input 900 W
Connector Proprietary
Full charge time ~7.3h
Compatible panels 20/20
MPPT: 10-145V
EB3A
Faster Max solar input 200 W
Connector DC7909
Full charge time ~2.4h
Compatible panels 6/20
MPPT: 12-28V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
AC200MAXEB3A
Emergency(2)
2/21/2
2/2
1/2
Entertainment(2)
2/21/2
2/2
1/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/21/2
2/2
1/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
6/71/7
6/7
1/7
Home Infrastructure(3)
1/31/3
1/3
1/3
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | EB3A | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 8h | Safe | 1h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
11/111/11
11/11
1/11
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | EB3A | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Fail | N/A |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Fail | N/A |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Fail | N/A |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 0.6h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
Large Appliances(4)
3/41/4
3/4
1/4
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | EB3A | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Fail | N/A |
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
5/65/6
5/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
2/21/2
2/2
1/2
Power Tools(5)
2/50/5
2/5
0/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
The AC200MAX suits homeowners and off-grid users who need serious capacity, expandable storage, and the ability to run high-draw appliances. The EB3A makes sense for day-trippers, car campers, or anyone who values a lightweight grab-and-go unit for phones, laptops, and small electronics.
The AC200MAX is the clear winner here, covering more than twice the devices and offering expansion room the EB3A simply cannot match. In our 53-device benchmark, AC200MAX powers 45 devices and EB3A powers 21.
AC200MAX vs EB3A FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, AC200MAX or EB3A?
AC200MAX is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, AC200MAX or EB3A?
AC200MAX has higher battery capacity (2,048 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
EB3A has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, AC200MAX or EB3A?
EB3A is lighter at 10.1 lbs vs 61.9 lbs. EB3A is rated ultralight for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
AC200MAX powers 45 of 53 tested devices, compared to 21 for EB3A.
Q Can you expand the battery capacity of AC200MAX or EB3A?
Only AC200MAX supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. EB3A is limited to its built-in 268.8 Wh.