Capacity
Explorer 3000 Pro: +976 Wh (+47.7%).
This comparison targets buyers weighing a mid-range expandable system against a higher-output all-in-one for off-grid use or home backup. The Explorer 3000 Pro delivers 3000W of running power and 3024 Wh of capacity, giving it a clear edge in raw output over the AC200MAX's 2200W and 2048 Wh.
That extra headroom shows in device compatibility testing: the Jackery unit powered 47 of 53 devices versus 45 for the Bluetti, earning a higher overall score of 93 to 88.5. Solar input also favors the Explorer 3000 Pro at 1400W max compared to 900W.
The tradeoff is longevity and flexibility. Bluetti's LFP chemistry is rated for 3500 cycles versus 2000 for the NMC-based Jackery, and the AC200MAX supports battery expansion, letting you scale capacity over time without replacing the entire unit.
Overall Winner
Explorer 3000 Pro
Powers 47 of 53 tested devices vs 45 for AC200MAX
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Explorer 3000 Pro: +976 Wh (+47.7%).
Explorer 3000 Pro: +800 W (+36.4%).
Explorer 3000 Pro: +1,200 W (+25.0%).
AC200MAX: -2.0 lbs (3.1% lighter).
AC200MAX: +1,500 cycles (+75.0%).
Out of 53 devices tested, 2 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 45 · Differences: 4% (2/53) · Neither can run: 6
These are 240V or high-voltage devices โ neither station supports them.
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Central AC (3-Ton)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
| Spec | AC200MAX | Explorer 3000 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,048 Wh | 3,024 Wh ✓ |
| Running Power | 2,200 W | 3,000 W ✓ |
| Surge Power | 4,800 W | 6,000 W ✓ |
| Weight | 61.9 lbs (28.1 kg) ✓ | 63.9 lbs (29.0 kg) |
| Energy Density | 72.9 Wh/kg | 104.3 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | heavy | heavy |
| Chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Cycle Life | 3,500 ✓ | 2,000 |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
MPPT: 10-145V
MPPT: 17.5-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 17.3h | Safe | 25.5h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Safe | 1.7h | Safe | 2.5h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 2h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Tight | 1.1h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Safe | 3h |
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 8h | Safe | 11.8h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Safe | 1.3h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Safe | 1.1h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 2.2h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 7.1h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 10.2h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circular Saw (Corded) | Fail | N/A | Tight | 1.2h |
| Corded Drill / Hammer Drill | Safe | 1.3h | Safe | 2h |
| Electric Chainsaw (14-inch) | Fail | N/A | Tight | 1.2h |
| Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon) | Soft Start | 0.9h | Soft Start | 1.3h |
| Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak) | Tight | 1h | Safe | 1.5h |
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
Choose the AC200MAX if long cycle life and expandable storage matter most, particularly for a permanent home backup setup you plan to grow incrementally. Go with the Explorer 3000 Pro if you need higher sustained wattage and broader device coverage right out of the box, especially for demanding appliances or jobsite loads. The Explorer 3000 Pro is the stronger pick overall, combining greater power output, larger capacity, and wider compatibility in a single portable package.
Explorer 3000 Pro is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Explorer 3000 Pro has higher battery capacity (3,024 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
AC200MAX has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
AC200MAX is lighter at 61.9 lbs vs 63.9 lbs. AC200MAX is rated heavy for portability.
Explorer 3000 Pro powers 47 of 53 tested devices, compared to 45 for AC200MAX.
Only AC200MAX supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 3000 Pro is limited to its built-in 3,024 Wh.