Capacity
Explorer 3000 Pro: +982 Wh (+48.1%).
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two Jackery 3000W portable power stations that share the same running and surge power ratings (3000W / 6000W) yet differ in meaningful ways under the hood. The Explorer 2000 Plus uses LFP chemistry rated for 4,000 cycles, roughly double the 2,000-cycle lifespan of the NMC-based Explorer 3000 Pro.
It also charges faster on solar, reaching full in about 7.3 hours versus 10.8 hours, and supports battery expansion for scaling capacity over time. The 3000 Pro counters with a larger 3,024 Wh battery compared to 2,042 Wh, delivering roughly 48% more stored energy out of the box.
Both units powered the same 47 of 53 tested devices, and both earned an overall score of 93. The tradeoff is straightforward: longer cycle life and expandability versus higher built-in capacity.
Overall Winner
Explorer 3000 Pro
Powers 47 of 53 tested devices
Explorer 3000 Pro wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Explorer 3000 Pro: +982 Wh (+48.1%).
Delta: Tie (0%).
Delta: Tie (0%).
Explorer 2000 Plus: -2.4 lbs (3.8% lighter).
Explorer 2000 Plus: +2,000 cycles (+100.0%).
These two stations produce the same result on 53 of 53 devices.
Both can run: 47 · Neither can run: 6
These are 240V or high-voltage devices โ neither station supports them.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
| Spec | Explorer 2000 Plus | Explorer 3000 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,042 Wh | 3,024 Wh ✓ |
| Running Power | 3,000 W | 3,000 W |
| Surge Power | 6,000 W | 6,000 W |
| Weight | 61.5 lbs (27.9 kg) ✓ | 63.9 lbs (29.0 kg) |
| Energy Density | 73.2 Wh/kg | 104.3 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | heavy | heavy |
| Chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Cycle Life | 4,000 ✓ | 2,000 |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
MPPT: 11-60V
MPPT: 17.5-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
| Device | Explorer 2000 Plus | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 17.2h | Safe | 25.5h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Safe | 1.7h | Safe | 2.5h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 2h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Safe | 3h |
| Device | Explorer 2000 Plus | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 7.9h | Safe | 11.8h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Device | Explorer 2000 Plus | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Safe | 1.3h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Safe | 1.1h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 2.2h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 7.1h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Device | Explorer 2000 Plus | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 10.2h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Device | Explorer 2000 Plus | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circular Saw (Corded) | Tight | 0.8h | Tight | 1.2h |
| Corded Drill / Hammer Drill | Safe | 1.3h | Safe | 2h |
| Electric Chainsaw (14-inch) | Tight | 0.8h | Tight | 1.2h |
| Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon) | Soft Start | 0.9h | Soft Start | 1.3h |
| Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.5h |
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
Choose the Explorer 2000 Plus if you prioritize long-term durability, faster solar recharging, and the ability to add batteries as your needs grow. The Explorer 3000 Pro suits buyers who need more energy storage right away and prefer a single, higher-capacity unit without extra modules. Our pick is the Explorer 3000 Pro for its larger 3,024 Wh battery, which gives it a practical edge for extended home backup or heavy-load scenarios where every watt-hour counts.
Explorer 3000 Pro is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Explorer 3000 Pro has higher battery capacity (3,024 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Explorer 2000 Plus has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Explorer 2000 Plus is lighter at 61.5 lbs vs 63.9 lbs. Explorer 2000 Plus is rated heavy for portability.
Both power stations can run 47 of 53 tested devices.
Only Explorer 2000 Plus supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 3000 Pro is limited to its built-in 3,024 Wh.