Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,024 Wh | Explorer 3000 Pro leads
Explorer 2000 v2 2,042 Wh
Explorer 3000 Pro 3,024 Wh
Explorer 3000 Pro: +982 Wh (+48.1%).
Explorer 2000 v2 vs Explorer 3000 Pro
VS
2,200W
Running power
3,000W
2,042 Wh
Battery
3,024 Wh
39.5 lbs
Weight
63.9 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two Jackery stations that sit at different points on the capacity and power spectrum. The Explorer 3000 Pro delivers 3000W of running power and 3024 Wh of capacity, while the Explorer 2000 v2 offers 2200W and 2042 Wh.
That gap matters for high-draw appliances: the 3000 Pro passed 47 of 53 devices in compatibility testing versus 45 for the 2000 v2. Solar recharge also favors the 3000 Pro, which accepts up to 1400W of solar input and can refill in roughly 10.8 hours compared to 14.6 hours at the 2000 v2's 400W max.
The tradeoff is significant, though. The 2000 v2 uses LFP chemistry rated for 4000 cycles, doubles the 3000 Pro's 2000-cycle NMC lifespan, weighs 24 pounds less at 39.5 lbs, and includes 20ms UPS switchover that the 3000 Pro lacks.
Overall Winner
Explorer 3000 Pro
Powers 47 of 53 tested devices vs 45 for Explorer 2000 v2
Home backup: Tie RV / mobile: Explorer 2000 v2 Solar: Explorer 3000 Pro
Explorer 3000 Pro wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Choose Explorer 2000 v2 if...
- + Portability matters (40 lbs vs 64)
- + You value battery longevity (LFP, 4,000 cycles)
- + Built-in UPS with 20ms switchover
Choose Explorer 3000 Pro if...
- + You want faster solar recharging
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,000 W | Explorer 3000 Pro leads
Explorer 2000 v2 2,200 W
Explorer 3000 Pro 3,000 W
Explorer 3000 Pro: +800 W (+36.4%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 6,000 W | Explorer 3000 Pro leads
Explorer 2000 v2 4,400 W
Explorer 3000 Pro 6,000 W
Explorer 3000 Pro: +1,600 W (+36.4%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 39.5 lbs | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
Explorer 2000 v2 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg)
Explorer 3000 Pro 63.9 lbs (29.0 kg)
Explorer 2000 v2: -24.5 lbs (38.3% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,000 cycles | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
Explorer 2000 v2 4,000 cycles
Explorer 3000 Pro 2,000 cycles
Explorer 2000 v2: +2,000 cycles (+100.0%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 2 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 45 · Differences: 4% (2/53) · Neither can run: 6
Neither can run · 6 devices
These are 240V or high-voltage devices — neither station supports them.
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Central AC (3-Ton)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | Explorer 2000 v2 | Explorer 3000 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,042 Wh | 3,024 Wh ✓ |
| Running Power | 2,200 W | 3,000 W ✓ |
| Surge Power | 4,400 W | 6,000 W ✓ |
| Weight | 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg) ✓ | 63.9 lbs (29.0 kg) |
| Energy Density | 114.1 Wh/kg ✓ | 104.3 Wh/kg |
| Portability Tier | portable | heavy |
| Chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Cycle Life | 4,000 ✓ | 2,000 |
| Expandable | No | No |
| UPS | Yes (20 ms) | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
Explorer 2000 v2
Max solar input 400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~14.6h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 16-60V
Explorer 3000 Pro
Faster Max solar input 1,400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~10.8h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 17.5-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
Explorer 2000 v2Explorer 3000 Pro
Emergency(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
6/76/7
6/7
6/7
| Device | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 17.2h | Safe | 25.5h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Safe | 1.7h | Safe | 2.5h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 2h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Tight | 1.1h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Safe | 3h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
1/31/3
1/3
1/3
| Device | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 7.9h | Safe | 11.8h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
11/1111/11
11/11
11/11
| Device | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Safe | 1.3h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Safe | 1.1h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 2.2h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 7.1h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
Large Appliances(4)
3/43/4
3/4
3/4
| Device | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 3000 Pro | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 10.2h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 1.6h |
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
5/65/6
5/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Power Tools(5)
2/54/5
2/5
4/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
Pick the Explorer 2000 v2 if longevity, portability, and emergency UPS backup matter most to you; its LFP battery and lighter frame make it a better fit for frequent cycling and mobile use. Go with the Explorer 3000 Pro if you need to run higher-wattage equipment and want faster solar recovery for extended off-grid or whole-home backup scenarios. With a compatibility score of 93 versus 88, the Explorer 3000 Pro earns the overall recommendation for buyers who prioritize raw power and device coverage.
Explorer 2000 v2 vs Explorer 3000 Pro FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, Explorer 2000 v2 or Explorer 3000 Pro?
Explorer 3000 Pro is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, Explorer 2000 v2 or Explorer 3000 Pro?
Explorer 3000 Pro has higher battery capacity (3,024 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
Explorer 3000 Pro has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, Explorer 2000 v2 or Explorer 3000 Pro?
Explorer 2000 v2 is lighter at 39.5 lbs vs 63.9 lbs. Explorer 2000 v2 is rated portable for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
Explorer 3000 Pro powers 47 of 53 tested devices, compared to 45 for Explorer 2000 v2.
Q Does Explorer 2000 v2 or Explorer 3000 Pro have UPS mode for power outages?
Only Explorer 2000 v2 has UPS (uninterruptible power supply) mode with a 20ms switchover time, which keeps connected devices running during a power outage without interruption.